The former Ohio State head men’s swimming coach failed to promote an atmosphere of rules compliance related to recruiting violations, according to a Division I Committee on Infractions panel. The violations stemmed from a prospect living near campus before enrollment, which the Committee on Infractions has repeatedly warned can lead to violations.

Plattsburgh State has received a public reprimand, suspensions and a financial penalty after misconduct by student-athletes at this year’s NCAA Division III Women’s Ice Hockey Championship.

Elmhurst did not monitor its athletics program and its director of financial aid acted unethically when she awarded scholarships based on athletics criteria to student-athletes, resulting in a lack of institutional control, according to a decision by the Division III Committee on Infractions.

Methodist improperly administered an otherwise permissible scholarship when it awarded $110,000 in scholarships to 11 soccer student-athletes and no non-athlete students, according to a decision issued by the NCAA Division III Committee on Infractions.

Monmouth failed to monitor its men’s tennis program and the conduct of the former head coach, according to a Division I Committee on Infractions panel.

A Division I Committee on Infractions hearing panel could not conclude that the University of North Carolina violated NCAA academic rules when it made available deficient Department of African and Afro-American Studies “paper courses” to the general student body, including student-athletes.

Rutgers failed to monitor its football program over a five-year period when it did not ensure its football student host group and its drug-testing program followed university policy and NCAA rules.

A former Pacific head men’s basketball coach failed to promote an atmosphere of compliance when he violated academic misconduct and recruiting rules to get prospects eligible

A former South Florida assistant men’s basketball coach acted unethically when he knowingly violated NCAA rules to provide prospects with impermissible housing, transportation and meals, and then denied his involvement in the violations.

Leadership of one of the NCAA’s most high-profile committees changed hands this month. And while the outgoing chair led the Division I Committee on Infractions through significant improvements to the process, the new chair is at the helm of an established committee confident in its promise to deliver fair, consistent decisions.