North Carolina Central did not monitor its certification process when it improperly certified 22 student-athletes in seven sports as eligible for competition.

The University of Utah baseball coach did not promote an atmosphere of compliance when he instructed his then-director of baseball operations to impermissibly perform coaching duties

A former College of Mount Saint Vincent head men’s soccer coach arranged for his father, a booster, to co-sign a student loan application for a recruit.

Download the April 2018 Southern Indiana Public Infractions Decision A University of Southern Indiana booster engaged in impermissible recruiting with a prospect, according to a decision issued by the Division II Committee on Infractions...

Sacramento State failed to monitor its men’s and women’s tennis programs, resulting in numerous violations over the course of five years.

San Francisco failed to monitor its golf program, allowing two former head coaches to engage in recruiting violations.

The NCAA Division I Infractions Appeals Committee overturned a NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions finding that a former Louisville men’s basketball program assistant did not fully cooperate with an investigation.

The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga did not monitor the living arrangements of three men’s tennis student-athletes who received reduced-cost housing from a booster.

Louisville must vacate men's basketball records in which student-athletes competed while ineligible during the 2011-12 through 2014-15 academic years.

To provide clarity around some of the most serious infractions within the Association, the NCAA has developed a clear outline of specific guidelines the enforcement staff considers when determining whether to bring allegations for four serious breaches of conduct — lack of institutional control, failure to monitor, unethical conduct and head coach responsibility.