SSI Newsletter

The revolution redefining ‘mental toughness’ and saving athletes

By Brandon Sneed

A college guy I’ve never met messaged me the other day from seven states away and said he’d had a breakdown. He’s a football player, and he left his locker room crying. “I lost my ability as a functioning student-athlete,” he wrote. He’d gone through a lot — family problems, losing his starting spot, “wanting to vanish from society” — and more. He said he was “going through a mental head game.”

 “I have been so scared to reach out and get help,” he wrote. “I felt like I was the only one.”


On Field Evaluation of the Injured Athlete

Sports-related injuries are the fourth leading cause of spinal cord injury, accounting for 7.93 percent of all injuries per the National Spinal Cord Injury Center. SCI can occur during any sport, but football has the highest rate of SCI, followed by ice hockey, lacrosse and rugby. Prevalence of SCI has decreased with education on injury prevention. 


Advising athletes on proper playing technique, educating medical staff about...

The Athlete’s Kitchen: Alcohol & Athletes

By Nancy Clark, M.S., R.D., CSSD

Athletes are competitive. Unfortunately, too many competitive athletes are also competitive drinkers, not to be outdone by their teammates. Ask any coach or college athletics director, and you’ll hear concern about alcohol and athletes—a dangerous duo, especially among team sports. Excessive alcohol intake is associated with injuries, poor grades in school, arguments, sexual violence, loss of memory, driving under the influence and trouble with the law—to say nothing of vomiting, hangovers and...

Division II and Division III health and safety summits

On Oct. 21 - 22, the NCAA Sport Science Institute hosted an assembly of presidents, directors of athletics, team physicians, athletic trainers, coaches and student-athletes for the first health and safety summits targeted specifically for Divisions II and III. Held at the NCAA’s national office in Indianapolis, the events included presentations by Brian Hainline, the NCAA chief medical officer, Dr. and the director of SSI, John Parsons, as well as associate director of SSI, Mary Wilfert, on current NCAA health and safety priorities.

Division II met Tuesday, Oct. 20, and Division III convened Wednesday, Oct. 21. The summits focused on a series of round table conversations in which participants discussed the impact of concussion, cardiac health, mental health, and doping and recreation drug use in their specific divisions. The events each concluded with an open dialogue on the future of health and safety on their respective campuses.

Care for the Student-Athlete with Sickle Cell Trait

Sickle cell trait is not a disease and is not a barrier to exercise or participation in sport. It is the inheritance of one gene for normal hemoglobin (A) and one gene for sickle hemoglobin (S), giving the genotype AS. Sickle cell trait (AS) is not sickle cell anemia (SS), in which two abnormal genes are inherited. Sickle cell anemia causes major anemia and many clinical problems, whereas sickle cell trait causes no anemia and few clinical problems. Sickle cell trait will not turn into the disease.

The NCAA Sport Science Institute and the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are committed to the health, safety and well-being of student-athletes with sickle cell trait (SCT).  The majority of individuals who have sickle cell trait have no personal medical problems related to their carrier status, and there are no significant differences in performance between athletes who have SCT versus those who do not have SCT.

Universal precautions are an important component of any program intending to protect student-athlete health and safety, regardless of their SCT status. Implementing universal precautions to all student-athletes may assist in avoiding situations that may predispose the student-athlete with SCT to exertion-related injuries. These precautions are applicable to the prevention or management of a variety of medical conditions. Institutions should provide an environment in which precautions can be taken. These precautions include, but are not limited to:

  • Managing heat exposure, including the implementation of, and adherence to, established acclimatization protocols. Heat, dehydration, altitude and asthma can increase the risk for and worsen complications associated with SCT, even when exercise is not intense.
  • Supporting adequate nutrition and hydration, especially in hot and humid climates. Student-athletes should refrain from consuming high-caffeine energy drinks and supplements, or other stimulants, as they may contribute to dehydration.
  • Understanding the impact of exercise intensity, especially in the untrained or undertrained student-athlete, and implementation of progressively intense exercise in the first few weeks of the season.
  • Providing adequate time for rest and recovery both during an exercise session and after intense and/or extended periods of physical activity.
  • Development, implementation and adherence to site-specific emergency action plans with appropriate medical equipment and staff to intervene during an emergency situation. Education and counseling are essential for helping student-athletes with SCT understand the potential risks associated with SCT and intense physical activity.


About the American Society of Hematology

The American Society of Hematology is the world’s largest professional society of physicians, scientists, and medical trainees committed to the study and treatment of blood and blood-related diseases.  Among the Society’s more than 15,000 members are clinicians who specialize in treating children and adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) and researchers who investigate the causes and potential treatments of SCD manifestations.  For more than 50 years, the Society has led the development of hematology as a discipline by promoting research, patient care, education, training, and advocacy.  The official journal of ASH, Blood, is the most cited peer-reviewed publication in the field.  Blood is available weekly in print and online at  

Psychological Aspects of Sports Concussion

It is hard to imagine that a sports-related concussion (SRC) or mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), or any event that triggers significant physical and cognitive symptoms and changes from normal functioning, would not produce some emotional or psychological reactions.  However, most of the focus in SRC management has been on tracking physical based symptoms (e.g. headache, balance problems, sleep disturbance/fatigue) and neurocognitive status (e.g. processing speed, attention/concentration, learning/memory) over time until the individual returns to baseline or asymptomatic status.  Emotional or psychological aspects, while seen as important factors in prolonged/persistent post-concussive syndrome, have not been discussed or investigated at the same level as the other symptom areas.

Emotional and psychological aspects of SRC can emerge related to a student-athlete’s response to injury and/or their response to recovery. Responses to injury typically produce a sense of loss (loss of control, loss of skills, loss of normalcy), a sense of vulnerability or fear, and anxiety/worry. Student-athletes often describe initial symptoms as “feeling off” or “not like myself,” which can be disconcerting.  In some instances, depressed mood or changes in behavior emerge as a direct result of the concussion in the acute recovery phase and can be related to fatigue.  Emotional and psychological responses play a crucial role in the athlete’s recovery (Mainwaring, Hutchison, Camper & Richards, 2012); these responses can include depressed mood, anxiety about the future, re-injury fears, frustration or anger (especially if symptoms persist beyond their expected time frame or have impacted their athletic career), sense of loss of team role or identity as an active and contributing student-athlete, significant disruption in social network and negative impact on academic pursuits.  After a SRC, some athletes are told by providers to physically rest and have “brain rest” (cognitive rest), which may be appropriate in the initial week of recovery, but can have harmful effects later in recovery.  Unfortunately, the terms “brain rest” or “cognitive rest” are not well-defined by providers and student-athletes have often understood it to mean “don’t think.”   For some, this prescription creates a fear of thinking and the belief that thinking or cognitive activity will harm their brain.  This is similar process to the development of a fear of movement (kinesiophobia) in pain patients, which can further restrict activities (Schmidt, 2003).  Removal from, or lessening of, academic demands may be appropriate for a period of time for some student-athletes, but the stress of falling behind and then having to make up and keep up with school assignments can often be significant and make its own contribution to symptoms.

The emotional symptoms that emerge from SRC can prolong recovery and often reflect  predisposing or premorbid factors. These factors can include prior depression or anxiety disorders, traumatic stress history, prior head injuries or other neurological vulnerabilities, learning issues, hypervigilance or somatic focus, or personality characteristics or disorders (Silverberg & Iverson, 2011).  Psychological factors associated with prolonged or persistent post-concussive symptoms include ineffective and maladaptive coping styles, sleep disturbance often due to mental activation, anxiety and stress/rumination, nocebo effect (adverse effects created or maintained by  negative expectations (Hahn, 1997; Scudellari, 2013)) and other expectation effects, and family or social network/support problems. Since the primary tool in the medical management of SRC involves tracking symptoms over time, one must wonder if focusing on symptoms on a daily or regular basis produces hypervigilance to symptoms and can result in reinforced illness behavior and iatrogenic effects resulting in prolonged post-concussion symptoms. 

Symptom checklists for concussion are not specific to this condition only.  Endorsement of symptoms may reflect other conditions or factors and occur to some degree in non-concussed individuals. These symptom checklists or rating scales are typically used as a general trending tool in recovery, but are largely reflective of self-perceived severity with highly individualized anchor points: are student-athletes rating the symptoms as an average over time since the last appointment or their worst experience of the symptom in the interval, or some other calculation?  Psychological and emotional factors, such as being an amplifier/maximizer or minimizer of symptoms, can be strong influences on these symptom ratings and need to be considered when reviewing the ratings during recovery.

Following a SRC, neurocognitive testing results often reflect a decline in certain cognitive areas for a period of time, which can be concerning to athletes and create focused attention to any and all cognitive inefficiencies.  In some instances, normal range inefficiencies are seen as evidence of ongoing SRC symptoms and/or slow recovery, which produce more stress and perpetuate the idea of and concern for continued brain-based injury.

Recognition that post-concussion syndrome is best managed in a multidisciplinary approach (NCAA Sport Science Institute) is crucial in being able to address these prolonging factors. While post-concussion syndrome and neurocognitive symptoms can initially be determined by the concussive event, at some point in time, these symptoms may become more maintained or prolonged by non-brain-based factors (or a combination of factors). Continuing to discuss symptoms as concussion-related some months post injury may perpetuate a brain injury focus which can contribute to activation of prolonging factors, a greater sense of disability and longer recovery times. Ideally, management and treatment of SRC should include opportunities to evaluate/address psychological or emotional factors or responses, which are likely activated in student-athletes to varying degrees.  As a member of the sports medicine team, clinically trained sport psychologists have the expertise to provide support to these injured student-athletes and address both their responses to injury and recovery, and be helpful in dealing with maladaptive coping strategies and recalibrate expectancies. The clinical sport psychologist can provide support in dealing with temporary or extended challenges to identity, athletic identity, self-esteem, and future plans and goals. These interventions often provide opportunities to deal with the fear of reinjury, address potential concerns over long-term consequences of concussions, and add to their general problem solving and resilience skills.  

The depression and anxiety that can emerge in recovery may track positively with the improving physical symptoms in many instances, but it may be important to assess and address these emotional dimensions independently, as the concussion experience may trigger other issues. Application of cognitive-behavioral therapy interventions for persistent post-concussion syndrome have shown positive results, with early brief intervention reducing prolonged recovery (Snell, Surgenor, Hay-Smith & Siegert, 2009). Components seen as effective include education about post-concussion symptoms, reattribution of  these symptoms to benign causes, reassurance of favorable prognosis, and gradual resumption of pre-injury activities (Mittenburg, Tremont, Zielinski, Fichera & Rayis, 1996; Mittenburg, Canyock, Condit & Patton, 2001).

It is important to recognize the role that psychological and emotional factors play in the response to injury and the course of recovery in SRC.  While the initial focus may be on physical based symptoms and reaching a physiologically-based return to play status (e.g., exertion without symptoms, game level stamina), psychological and emotional factors can be crucial in understanding and managing the student-athlete as they recover cognitively and emotionally, and return to pre-injury levels of performance.  Clinical sport psychologists can play an important role in the management of SRC. They have the expertise to assess and intervene and be an integral part of the  student-athlete’s recovery..


Hahn, R. (1997)  The Nocebo Phenomenon:  Concept, Evidence and Implications for Public Health.  Preventive Medicine, 26, 607-611.

Mainwaring, L., Hutchison, M., Comper, P. & Richards, D. (2012) Examining emotional sequelae of sport concussion.  Journal of Clinical Sports Psychology, 6(3), 247-274.

Mittenburg, W., Tremont, G., Zielinski, R., Fichera, S. & Rayls, K.  (1996) Cognitive-Behavioral Prevention of Postconcussion Syndrome.  Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11(2), 139-145.

Mittenburg, W., Canyock, E., Condit, D. & Patton, C.  (2001)  Treatment of post-concussion syndrome following mild head injury.  Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23, 829-836.

Schmidt, A. (Oct 2003)  Does ‘mental kinesiophobia’ exist?  Behavior Research and Therapy, 41(10), 1243-1249.

Scudellari, M. (July 1 2013)  Worried Sick.  The Scientist Magazine (

Silverberg, N. & Iverson,G. (2011) Etiology of the post-concussion syndrome:  Physiogenesis and psychogenesis revisited.  NeuroRehabilitation, 29, 317-329.

Snell, D., Surgenor, L., hay-Smith, E. & Siegert, R. (2009)  A systematic review of psychological treatments for mild traumatic brain injury:  An update on the evidence.  Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(1), 20-38.

About David Coppel, Ph.D.

Dr. David Coppel is a Professor in the Department of Neurological Surgery and the Director of Neuropsychological Services and Research at the University of Washington Sports Concussion Program, located at both Harborview Medical Center and Seattle Children’s Hospital. He works as a Clinical Psychologist, Clinical Neuropsychologist and Sport Psychologist in his current positions.  He is a Clinical Professor in both the Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences and the Department of Psychology at the University of Washington. Since 1996, Dr. Coppel has been the Consulting Neuropsychologist and Clinical/Sport Psychologist for the Seattle Seahawks. In his work at the Sports Concussion Program, he provides consultation regarding sports concussions to a number of high school, college and professional sports teams. Over the past 30 years, Dr. Coppel has specialized in clinical sport psychology and performance psychology and provided consultation to athletes, performers, and coaches at the amateur, collegiate, Olympic, and professional levels of competition.

Subscribe to RSS - SSI Newsletter