Media Investigations Are Helping Compliance

“Freedom of the press is not an end in itself but a means to the end of achieving a free society.”
- Felix Frankfurter, former Supreme Court Justice

For a long time, the high watermark of NCAA investigation was the federal authorities. When the feds began sniffing around allegation of NCAA wrongdoing, it felt like only a matter of time before the case would be blown wide open. While it was over three years before the University of Southern California would appear before the Committee on Infractions, the fact that federal investigators were poking around the case as part of an extortion investigation made it seem more likely the original Reggie Bush report would result in NCAA sanctions.

Those two articles are just some of the many signs that there’s a new sheriff in town. Yahoo! Sports has proven to be stunningly, almost supernaturally good at uncovering NCAA violations by some of the biggest athletic departments in the country. They are the poster child, but they aren’t alone. While not in the field of compliance, Chip Brown of Orangebloods.com was in front of every move the Big 12 made during this summer’s conference reshuffling.

It’s only natural for compliance officers to have mixed feelings about the Yahoo! Sports team, and it’s hard to begrudge those that are hostile. When a reporter finds out about a potential violation before the compliance office does, it looks bad. There’s plenty of good reasons for it though. Maybe a source that wouldn’t speak to the compliance office will talk to a reporter. A compliance office has little reason to audit a coach’s emails due to the relatively loose rules, but a journalist might have a tip.

There’s also the feeling that the NCAA is “outsourcing” its enforcement responsibilities to the media. This means that larger schools are perceived to be targets because they bring more eyeballs and ad dollars. It also means that public schools, subject to open records laws, are at a disadvantage to private schools, who generally get to keep their documents under wraps.

As foolish as a compliance office might look, sometimes they are ahead of the media. While Yahoo! Sports gets the credit for being the first to report allegations that Ohio State head football coach Jim Tressel knew of his student-athletes receipt of extra benefits long before the violation was reported, the university had been on the case for almost two months at that point and was preparing a self-report of the violation.

Ultimately the team at Yahoo! Sports is a force of good in college athletics. The uncovering of violations and the sanctioning of offenders helps fix what is broken (sub. req’d) no matter who starts the process. We know that the NCAA and its members haven’t punted enforcement to the media and many talented and dedicated people are working from the inside. Outside help shouldn’t be turned away.

Plus the team at Yahoo! Sports is just like us compliance folk. How did the string of agent extra benefit violations this summer come to pass? Through the cultivating of sources by the Agents, Gambling, and Amateurism staff. Journalists aren’t getting this done with subpoena power and criminal charges. They aren’t using any tool that a compliance office doesn’t have at their disposal.

Instead of reacting to Dan Wetzel, Charles Robinson, Jason King, and the many others as threats, see them as a challenge. So avoid the feelings of schadenfreude when another school is in the media’s sights. And when the call comes to your school, accept that it will be good for college athletics in the long run and take the medicine, as bitter as it may taste.

The opinions expressed on this blog are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by the NCAA or any NCAA member institution or conference. This blog is not a substitute for a compliance office.

About John Infante

The opinions expressed on this blog are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by the NCAA or any NCAA member institution or conference. This blog is not a substitute for a compliance office. If you’re a coach, do not attempt to contact the author looking for a second opinion. If you’re a parent, don’t attempt to contact the author looking for a first opinion. Compliance professionals are by their nature helpful people generally dedicated to getting to the truth. Coaches should have a bit of faith in their own, and parents should talk to one directly.

In the news: March 10

The art of the possible. Bradley R.H. Bethel, an assistant learning specialist from Ohio State, provided a strong piece for Inside Higher Ed in response to a Feb. 7 piece from Oklahoma’s Gerald Gurney.

The wrong approach on NCAA rules (Bradley R.H. Bethel, Inside Higher Ed)

Recognizing that there’s not necessarily a right or wrong on this issue, the Bethel piece seems more persuasive than Gurney’s.

Illustrating his point through an academically disadvantaged student-athlete that he calls  “Mark,” Bethel makes the point that remedial support can provide life-changing results for young people willing to do the work.

“ ‘Mark’ will probably never be a Rhodes Scholar,” Bethel wrote. “He is not likely to attend graduate school and probably will not earn Latin honors as an undergraduate. However, as our few months together have shown, he is far more capable than his ACT score indicates. Because of his hard work and my colleagues’ and my commitment to his learning, Mark has a chance to earn a college degree. He is on the verge of success, yet he is one of the athletes Gerald Gurney would have denied NCAA admission because Mark’s ACT score was too low.”

Determining where the provision of opportunity ends and exploitation begins is difficult. But Bethel’s article offers a compassionate and socially constructive perspective, based on the belief that individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds often outperform their standardized test scores once they are placed in a stronger academic setting.

He also notes, correctly in my mind, that the goal here is not necessarily to produce high-end scholars but rather to develop certain young people’s ability to attain a quality middle-class lifestyle.

“My fellow learning specialists and I are committed to our athletes’ learning, and we are trained and prepared to work with any athlete who comes through our doors, no matter how deficient his or her skills may be,” wrote Bethel, who does have quibbles about Division I’s progress-toward-degree requirements. “Not all of them are success stories, but every year across the country, hundreds, maybe thousands, of athletes become the first in their families to earn a college degree.”

Keeping up with the Jones story. Wednesday’s ineligibility ruling on Baylor basketball player Perry Jones III set of a spate of national reaction, including a terse response from Baylor AD Ian McCaw. Here’s a sample of op-ed material:

Was this really called for, NCAA? (Richard Justice, Houston Chronicle)

Baylor’s Jones declared ineligible, another Cam? (Dennis Dodd, CBSSports.com)

By midday Thursday, NCAA.org posted information challenging Baylor’s version of the story.

For the Record: Baylor University reinstatement decision (NCAA.org)

Copyright �© 2010-2012 NCAA �·