Week in review: Nov. 1-5

This was a busy, interesting and sad week around the college sports world. Let’s take a spin through the headlines:

BCS controversy redux: CBSSports.com reported Thursday that Utah’s attorney general met with Justice Department officials earlier in the week to discuss a possible federal investigation into college football’s Bowl Championship Series. The report said the Justice Department declined to comment on the meeting.

BCS Executive Director Bill Hancock said it was “hard to imagine a bigger waste of taxpayer money than to involve the government in college football.”

I don’t pretend to know the right answers about postseason football, but I can’t imagine how this seemingly endless controversy is helping the game.

Full cost of attendance: An item buried in Thursday’s Wall Street Journal didn’t attract much attention, but it seems notable: “Mark Emmert, the new president of the NCAA, said he’d be open to increasing the value of athletic grants-in-aid by perhaps $2,000 to $4,000, in order to cover the full cost of attending school. Doing so could help combat the problem of agents giving illegal benefits to players. ‘It’s not paying players; it’s covering the full cost of attendance,’ he said in an interview. But he’s adamant about not paying players. ‘They’re not employees; they’re students,’ he said.”

You make the call: The Chronicle of Higher Education this week noted that the the NCAA is considering creating a simulation of an NCAA investigation to help educate institutions and journalists on how the Association builds a case against an athletics program it believes may have run afoul of its rules. New Enforcement VP Julie Roe Lach said the “Enforcement Experience” would debut next year. Reporters and athletics officials would fill roles as NCAA investigators and members of the Division I Committee on Infractions in a mock case, Roe told the Chronicle.

This idea has its roots in the ultra-successful mock Division I basketball selections that the NCAA has sponsored now for several years. It’s a great approach, and everybody will benefit if influential media take part in this program, if it is launched. Exercises like this help achieve better understanding, which is good for the media, the NCAA and the public.

Testing the limits: It will be interesting to see how far websites can push their free-speech protections. Early in the week, Deadspin editor A.J. Daulerio told a sports media class in Indianapolis that he had no regrets about paying an informant for nude photos relating to the Brett Favre sexting scandal and then keeping the man’s identity secret. “That’s just how I operate,” he told the Indianapolis Star.

The Star noted that Deadspin’s work has been criticized by many major news outlets, but Daulerio told the class that “the payoff was much larger” since computer hits to the site quadrupled last month.

There’s some serious hubris there. It’s a bit reminiscent of the National Enquirer in the days preceding its Carol Burnett fiasco.

Spotlight on the faculty role: The role of the faculty athletics representative is one of those inside-baseball matters that isn’t likely to pique the interest of hard-core sports fans. But faculty reps do provide a vital role in the enterprise of college athletics, serving as the critical link between student-athletes’ educational and athletics experiences.

The Chronicle of Higher Education delivered a whopper of a package on faculty representatives, and I’m sure many faculty reps didn’t like what they read. Be that as it may, it’s a net gain for a prominent publication to actually pay attention to the function. Parts of the report are undeniably painful, and failures may be overstated (as in the main headline, “Faculty reps botch sports-oversight role”). But the package mainly illustrates the difficulties of the job while making a case that poor judgment or malfeasance in the function can be catastrophic.

Here’s the package (you’ll need to purchase if you’re not a Chronicle subscriber):

Same job, different views

Complaints and compromises lead to an abrupt departure

Former Alabama faculty rep describes his role in purported coverup

How to be an effective faculty athletics rep

Frequent flier: One faculty athletic rep’s busy schedule

Faculty reps botch sports-oversight role

Forever young: Finally, last week was notable because of sad news. A little more than a month ago, Nick Bell was the starting defensive end for Mississippi State. He experienced headaches in late September, was diagnosed with a brain tumor, was operated on Oct. 1 and died Tuesday.

Meanwhile, Notre Dame student videographer Declan Sullivan was buried Monday. Sullivan died last week after falling from a tower while taping a Notre Dame football practice in a windstorm.

I know everybody hopes their families can find peace in these worst of times.

NCAA Insider is an occasional take on college sports issues, as viewed by NCAA communications staff member David Pickle. Opinions are his alone.

NCAA Foreign Policy Helps Domestic Issues

The opinions expressed on this blog are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by the NCAA or any NCAA member institution or conference. This blog is not a substitute for a compliance office. If you’re a coach, do not attempt to contact the author looking for a second opinion. If you’re a parent, don’t attempt to contact the author looking for a first opinion. Compliance professionals are by their nature helpful people generally dedicated to getting to the truth. Coaches should have a bit of faith in their own, and parents should talk to one directly.

When the NCAA membership enacted Proposal 2009-22 last year, the reactions to the proposal sounded like responses to a new advertising initiative. The move was seen as the NCAA opening new markets for international recruiting particularly European basketball prospects.

That opinion misses the mark on two small fronts and one big front. First, international prospects generally and European basketball prospects specifically had been enrolling and competing for Division I institutions for years. The proposal just allows a broader range of prospective student-athletes to compete in Division I without penalty. Second, solving some of the issues 2009-22 addresses could have been accomplished with a smaller legislative change or changes by the Committee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement to the guidelines for reinstating these prospects.

The bigger error is that Proposal 2009-22 did not start international recruiting, rather it exists because of the growing success of international recruiting. If NCAA institutions were not successfully recruiting international prospects, clubs would not have begun moving athletes around different levels of the organization (i.e. youth players up to the professional team or professional players down to the youth team) for the purpose of jeopardizing the eligibility of their youth players.

While the idea of teams moving athletes around to keep them out of college seems like something that could never happen in the United States, it was relatively close to happening in at least one sport.

In 2007, the United States Soccer Federation launched the Development Academy system. Designed to combat a lack of skill development and training in the existing structure of club soccer, the USSF created a system where elite young athletes get more practice and repetitions, along with fewer games against higher quality opposition.

The MLS bought into the idea wholesale, requiring teams to field youth teams. Every American franchise now fields teams in the Academy, while Toronto FC fields teams in the Canadian Soccer League. The youth teams are generally free or have minimal fees, and employ full-time coaches.

The movement began to reach its logical conclusion this summer when Real Salt Lake launched the first residential academy in Casa Grande, AZ. Ultimately housing 80 players, RSL’s academy is akin to youth teams around the world where young players live, train, and sometimes attend class while training to see if they can break into the senior professional team. And Proposal 2009-22 helped make this possible:

Prior to RSL’s landmark academy, IMG has run a residential program in Bradenton, Florida, which supports the U-17 U.S. National Team, but until this summer NCAA regulations restricted young athletes from most interactions with the professional game. With those recent changes allowing young players to compete and train with professionals without losing amateur status, MLS clubs are able to more closely develop U.S. players according to worldwide standards while still preparing them for the college.

The MLS watched the NCAA’s deregulation of competition with professional teams carefully, and it was not until this summer that the MLS allowed athletes to move between the Academy and senior teams. Still, it’s hard to imagine that the MLS would have held off creating a youth development structure simply because it did not fit with the NCAA’s regulations. Had Proposal 2009-22 not passed, there eventually would have been a competition for top prospects between the systems that would develop them for college (high school, club, and non-MLS Academy teams) and the MLS Academies, which would develop them for professional athletics and potentially jeopardize their eligibility.

One question now could be how the effects of 2009-22 and the rise of youth teams attached to professional clubs in the United States could help other areas. Is there a place for USA Basketball and the NBA to work together to create a more controlled, top-down development system as an alternative to the bottom-up structure of grassroots basketball? There would be a number of issues, such as how to reward clubs for developing players, how the clubs interact with the NBA’s age limit, where a USA Basketball/NBA developmental league might fit in the men’s basketball recruiting calendar, not to mention who pays for all this. But none of these are insurmountable problems.

Proposal 2009-22 was intended to solve international problems. But it solved at least one impending domestic issue that threatened to kill off a collegiate sport. And it provides new tools the NCAA, national governing bodies, professional sports leagues, and existing youth development programs can use to work together to solve issues in the current recruiting and development environment. That could be where 2009-22 makes the greatest impact.

About John Infante

The opinions expressed on this blog are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by the NCAA or any NCAA member institution or conference. This blog is not a substitute for a compliance office. If you’re a coach, do not attempt to contact the author looking for a second opinion. If you’re a parent, don’t attempt to contact the author looking for a first opinion. Compliance professionals are by their nature helpful people generally dedicated to getting to the truth. Coaches should have a bit of faith in their own, and parents should talk to one directly.

Copyright �© 2010-2012 NCAA �·