On Monday, March 25, 2013, a federal court in Baton Rouge, Louisiana PDF of Marucci v NCAA lawsuitlawsuit challenging the NCAA’s aluminum baseball-bat standard after the NCAA decertified three of Marucci’s bat models following in-season compliance testing in 2012.
In March 2012, the NCAA notified Marucci that three of Marucci’s bat models – the Cat52 34”, Black 33”, and Black 34” – failed compliance testing under the NCAA’s BBCOR Standard. The purpose of the BBCOR Standard is to ensure wood bat-like performance for any aluminum and composite baseball bat used in NCAA competition. Marucci appealed the decertification decision to the NCAA Baseball Rules Committee, which denied the appeal. The next day, Marucci filed suit in federal court alleging the NCAA’s BBCOR Standard violated federal antitrust laws by unreasonably restraining trade.
The Court’s opinion, granting the NCAA’s motion to dismiss, held that the BBCOR Standard – like most NCAA rules “related to eligibility or amateurism” and those defining the “condition of the contest” – is entitled to a “procompetitive presumption” under the antitrust laws pursuant to Supreme Court precedent. The Court found that rules regulating aluminum bats are squarely within the presumption because of the need for the NCAA to adopt a single set of rules for NCAA baseball games. Because it is undisputed that all bat manufacturers are subject to the BBCOR Standard, the Court found that Marucci’s complaint did not state an antitrust claim, and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.